Author's disclaimer: I hesitate to write this, knowing it might stir controversy or strain friendships in an industry that I am part of. But silence isn’t an option when so many dreams are at stake.
This is the story of hundreds of Filipino pilots — young, talented, and type-rated — whose wings have been clipped by a system that’s failing them.
It’s a story of ambition, sacrifice, and betrayal, and it needs to be told.
They’ve mastered complex systems, aced simulator sessions, and envisioned themselves in the cockpit of Philippine Airlines or Cebu Pacific, flying passengers safely through the skies.
But reality is cruel. Instead of soaring, they’re grounded. No job. No prospects. Just a logbook frozen at 200 hours and a type rating that’s more burden than badge.
They’re not alone. Hundreds of Filipino pilots, perhaps even more, are trapped in this limbo, their dreams mocked by a system that churns out talent but offers no runway for takeoff.
A flood of pilots, nowhere to fly
The Philippines produces CPL holders at a staggering rate. Flight schools, thriving on the aviation boom, graduate hundreds annually, each pilot investing P3-5 million for training and type ratings. These credentials are meant to unlock airline careers, proving mastery over jet or turboprop operations. Yet, most graduates find themselves unemployable.
Why? Local airlines like Philippine Airlines and Cebu Pacific set towering hiring bars: 500-1,500 flight hours, specific jet experience, multi-crew coordination training, and often a bachelor’s degree. A fresh CPL holder, with 200-250 hours on single-engine Cessnas, falls painfully short.
It’s a brutal Catch-22 — you need experience to get the job, but you need a job to gain experience.
Some flight schools, meanwhile, often fan false hopes.
Glossy brochures and bold promises of “airline opportunities” lure students into costly programs, especially type ratings that expire in a year unless renewed at further expense.
For many, these ratings become expensive relics, gathering dust alongside shattered confidence.
Let’s call it what it is: borderline predatory, exploiting the aspirations of young Filipinos who see aviation as their ticket to a better life.
The cadet conundrum
Adding salt to the wound, airlines have launched cadet pilot programs — structured pipelines promising a clear path from zero hours to a first officer seat.
Philippine Airlines just recently partnered with an Australian provider, while Cebu Pacific collaborates with CAE Philippines and Airworks Academy. These programs are polished and selective, molding raw recruits to exacting standards. Once fully funded scholarships, they’ve shifted to for-profit models, with cadets often taking loans with partner banks to cover costs.
Sounds ideal, right? Not for self-funded pilots.
Airlines rarely accept CPL holders with type ratings into these cadet programs, preferring to shape novices who owe loyalty to the company.
A type rating — proof a pilot can handle an A320’s fly-by-wire system or an ATR-72’s turboprop dynamics — is dismissed.
It’s as if a surgeon, trained and certified, is told they can’t operate because they didn’t graduate from the hospital’s own school.
The emotional toll is devastating.
These aren’t just statistics. They are people. These pilots have sacrificed years, sleepless nights, and their families’ futures, only to face rejection after rejection.
Many take jobs as flight instructors or leave aviation entirely, their passion buried under debt and disillusionment.
To type or not to type
I have often been asked by new pilot graduates and parents alike if they should invest in a type rating.
My advice takes a more conservative path that focuses on building skills.
I always caution against jumping into a type rating at the first chance. Rather, I encourage them to invest in additional skills, like getting multi-engine training, instrument night flying, spin/upset training, and then go towards becoming a flight instructor – earning flying time and reinforcing the theory and basic flying skills they just acquired.
It’s a time proven path that still holds true today. A flying school instructor builds time training others and can most likely meet airline flying time requirements. This feeds a pipeline with a (theoretically) workable turnover rate.
Besides, a successful career in aviation is not solely determined by an airline career. There’s business and general aviation that also offer very interesting pilot professions.
Some companies will conditionally hire none-type rated pilots provided they shoulder the cost of the type rating. This is where the investment in a type rating has the highest guarantee of a return on investment. It works for the airline as they don’t carry the financial risk of the training outcome, and it works for the trainee as they are already guaranteed a job after passing Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP) and line checks.
The unspoken barrier: connections
Assuming we successfully address the flying time issue, there’s also the quiet truth: In the Philippines, whom you know often matters more than what you know.
Whispers of pilots landing jobs through relatives in management or getting endorsement from powerful sponsors are common.
For those without such ties, the cockpit door stays locked, no matter how sharp their skills or polished their curricula vitae are.
It is a gut-punch to realize that talent alone is not enough in an industry that “works” like an exclusive club.
While not unique to aviation, this who-you-know culture undermines the principle of meritocracy.
Many talented, hard-working pilots watch from the sidelines, while others — less experienced but better connected — advance to employment within the minimum hours.
It is not just demoralizing. It is unjust.
A global echo, a local crisis
This is not unique to the Philippines. Globally, low-hour pilots face similar walls.
In the US, regional airlines struggle with shortages, yet fresh pilots cannot leap to majors requiring at least 1,500 hours for an Airline Transport Pilot License. In Europe, carriers like Ryanair prioritize their own cadets.
But the Philippine situation is dire. With just a handful of airlines and a flood of flight schools, the supply-demand mismatch is stark.
Boeing’s forecast of 800,000 pilots needed globally by 2045 is often dangled by schools to attract students.
Yet, for today’s graduates, that future feels like an illusion.
Local airlines plan fleet expansions — Philippine Airlines ordered nine Airbus A350s, and Cebu Pacific eyes up to 150 jets — but hiring lags.
Why? Airlines argue they need seasoned pilots to maintain safety and efficiency, especially post-COVID when training pipelines stalled.
It is a valid concern, but it also leaves self-funded pilots sidelined, their skills wasting.
Technical mastery, emotional scars
Let’s get technical. A type rating is not a trivial credential.
For an A320, it means mastering fly-by-wire controls, electronic centralized aircraft monitor alerts, and complex standard operating procedures.
For an ATR-72, it’s about handling turboprop dynamics and hand-flying skills under demanding conditions.
These pilots train in the same high-fidelity simulators airlines use, proving they can manage emergencies and multi-crew scenarios.
Yet, airlines reject them for lacking “minimum experience,” while fast-tracking their cadets to the same standards.
The human cost is heavier. Imagine investing your youth in a dream, only to be told you are not enough.
Self-doubt creeps in. Financial stress mounts. Many pilots owe loans with no income to repay them after thinking that the type rating is the ticket to employment into the airlines.
The fear of letting families down gnaws at their spirit. It’s heartbreaking to see such potential grounded by a system that seems indifferent.
A balanced perspective
Airlines are not the villains here. Operating in a high-stakes industry, they prioritize safety, efficiency, and long-term reliability.
Airline cadet programs ensure pilots are trained to their exact standards, reducing risk and fostering loyalty. It is a sound business strategy, that benefits them in the form of a lower turnover rate. But it is devastating to those already licensed and qualified in the system and are now locked out of consideration.
High flight hour experience requirements reflect the complexity of modern fleets and the need for seasoned judgment in the cockpit. Post-COVID recovery has also strained resources, with airlines cautious about rapid hiring.
Flight schools, too, face pressures. Many genuinely aim to produce skilled pilots, and global demand projections fuel their optimism.
But overpromising job prospects — whether intentional or not — crosses an ethical line.
The system’s flaws cannot be ignored.
When talented pilots are left jobless while airlines train novices, don’t you think something is broken?
When connections trump merit, fairness suffers. When schools profit from dashed hopes, trust erodes. All these leave students vulnerable.
A call for reform
This isn’t just a problem. We are in dire straits and there needs to be action.
Here is how I think we can start:
1. Bridge programs for type-rated pilots
Airlines should help create transition programs, offering line training or observer internship roles to bridge the experience gap. A training bond, repaid through future salaries, could offset costs. This gives self-funded pilots a fair shot, not just cadets from airline programs.
2. Mentorship and honest guidance
Flight schools must go beyond just selling flight training, pairing students with active line pilots for real-world coaching. Career counseling should reveal actual airline standards — not recycled theory or scripted simulator scenarios. Choose credible mentors who share knowledge, not low-experience influencers chasing clout and your money.
3. Transparency from schools
Flight schools must also disclose graduate employment rates.
If, say, 90 percent of alumni are jobless, students deserve to know before signing up. Regulators like CAAP could enforce this, and should fight deceptive marketing.
4. Industry-wide study and regulation
CAAP and the Department of Transportation should study the CPL-to-employment gap, especially for type-rated pilots.
How many are unemployed? Are we producing more pilots than the market needs? Can caps on flight school enrollment or stricter screening help balance supply and demand?
CAAP should also consult airlines on their hiring needs — multi-engine time, instrument flight rating skills, or technical knowledge gaps — to align training with reality.
5. Fairer hiring practices
Airlines should rethink rigid hour minimums, prioritizing skills, attitude, and knowledge over connections, or the worse kind: padded logbooks.
A structured evaluation process could identify raw talent among self-funded pilots, reducing reliance on insider networks.
6. Public dialogue
Let’s break the silence. Let’s elevate the discourse (not ‘rantfroms’ and slander fests) to share experiences, demand change, and share workable solutions. Awareness can protect future aviators from blind investments.
Final approach: A plea for hope
The Filipino aviation dream is vibrant but stuck in a holding pattern.
To airlines: Your future pilots are here — licensed, type-rated, and eager. Please give them a chance.
To flight schools: Stop selling illusions; guide students with the truth.
To regulators: Please listen. If we don’t fix this now, we risk losing a generation of talent. There is opportunity for us step up and align our training standards to global industry levels.
To aspiring pilots and families: Be discerning. Ask the tough questions before committing millions. Know that your passion also needs a practical path.
These young aviators are the future of Philippine aviation. Don’t let their spark fade away.
Let’s build a Philippine aviation industry where every pilot deserves a fair chance to fly, and every dream deserves a runway to launch from.
It’s time to turn empty promises into real opportunities.
To our grounded pilots: You are enough.
To every pilot out there feeling stuck, I see you, I hear you. Your dreams are valid, and your hard work is not wasted.
The system may be flawed, but your dreams are not. Your hard earned wings are still there, waiting for the right moment to soar.
Don’t fear failure, fear regret. Don’t give up on your dreams.
Patrick Roa started flying as a general aviation pilot. His career spans over 14,000 flying hours over 60 aircraft types. He holds an FAA license and is accredited by EASA and Transport Canada, among others.
He is part of Nomadic Aviation Group as its flight test manager.
Roa is the first Filipino accepted and trained at the National Test Pilot School and the first to complete supersonic high-performance upset recovery training.
He is based in Manila with his wife and son, and travels all over the world for ferry, demonstration and acceptance test flights.
Contributor
