How GCash’s bad loans compare with Maya, BDO, BPI and global peers

July 2, 2026
10:45AM PHT

GCash’s bad loan ratio is more than double those of the country’s biggest banks, but remains well below specialist consumer lenders, reflecting the different customers they serve.

A Frost & Sullivan comparison of 2024 lending portfolios showed GCash posted a 4.9 percent gross non-performing loan (NPL) ratio, compared with 1.8 percent for BDO and 2.1 percent for BPI, but below BillEase’s roughly 8 to 10 percent and Home Credit’s 6 to 8 percent.

The data was part of initial public offering (IPO) documents of parent firm Mynt as the company prepares to launch a record breaking Philippine listing in October. 

Higher risk, wider access

An NPL ratio measures the share of loans that borrowers have stopped repaying. 

While GCash is best known as a digital wallet rather than a bank, loans offered through GLoan and GGives have become a major growth engine. 

CreditTech is now the company’s second-largest revenue behind payments, whose contributions declined after the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas ordered mobile wallets to delink from online gambling apps. 

The higher bad ratio also reflects its focus on unsecured, collateral-free digital loans for first-time and previously underserved borrowers rather than the lower-risk customer base of traditional banks, widening access to formal credit while taking on greater lending risk.

Higher rates, higher costs

To help offset that risk, Mynt uses risk-based pricing, with GLoan charging 1.59 percent to 6.99 percent a month and GGives carrying monthly rates ranging from 0 percent to 5.49 percent, depending on the borrower and product, its prospects showed. 

Even with those rates, money set aside to cover expected loan defaults reached P12.62 billion in 2025, which was almost half of its CreditTech revenue, underscoring how costly unsecured digital lending can be.

Regional gap

Among Philippine digital lenders, GCash also compared favorably with Maya’s 5.77 percent gross NPL ratio and was broadly in line with GoTyme Bank’s estimated 5 to 6 percent. 

The gap widens across Southeast Asia, where Sea (1.2 percent), Grab (1.7 percent), GoTo (1.3 percent), Atome (2.0 percent) and Paytm (1.5 percent) all reported substantially lower bad loan ratios. Globally, Nubank (4.1 percent), Klarna (3.3 percent), Revolut (2.2 percent), Ant (2.5 percent) and PayPal (1.2 percent) also reported lower or broadly comparable figures. 

“Globally, GCash's NPL ratio places it among higher-risk fintechs, yet this outcome underscores its strategic focus on financial inclusion: deliberately expanding into underserved segments to achieve long-term scale and socioeconomic impact, rather than optimizing short-term margins,” Frost & Sullivan said. 

—Edited by Miguel R. Camus 

Featured News
Explore the latest news from InsiderPH
Thursday, 2 July 2026
1 hour ago
How GCash’s bad loans compare with Maya, BDO, BPI and global peers
Globe soars 9% after Mynt files record GCash IPO
29 Jun 2026
11:26AM
Who’s cashing in on GCash IPO? Funds, executives eye multibillion-peso payday
28 Jun 2026
11:30AM
Inside Mynt’s IPO: GCash growth, profits and key investor risks
27 Jun 2026
9:24PM
Insight to the one percent
© 2024 InsiderPH, All Rights Reserved.