Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) are fundamentally about creating value—for the government, private proponents, and, most importantly, the public. One of the most effective yet underutilized strategies in PPP structuring is project bundling, or the development of multi-purpose projects that integrate multiple components, services, or assets under a single contract.
When done thoughtfully, bundling makes strong economic, operational, and governance sense.
Benefits of bundling
At its core, project bundling brings together multiple components within a single PPP project, rather than limiting delivery to a single-purpose or standalone asset. This integrated approach naturally expands the range of services delivered to the public under one contractual framework.
Instead of relying on fragmented contracts, multiple bidding processes, and siloed implementation, bundling enables the government to deliver end-to-end solutions rather than isolated pieces of infrastructure. Citizens experience seamless services, not piecemeal outputs.
From a financial perspective, bundling results in bigger and more stable revenue streams. A project with multiple revenue-generating components is inherently more attractive to serious investors and lenders.
Larger projects encourage participation by stronger proponents or consortia with deeper technical, financial, and operational capacity. This improves bankability, lowers financing costs, and enhances long-term sustainability.
Equally important is impact concentration. Bundling creates greater developmental impact within a single contract. Instead of spreading limited government attention across multiple projects, bundling allows one well-structured PPP to address several public needs at once whether economic, social, environmental, and institutional.
The result is faster execution, clearer accountability, and measurable outcomes.
Water as a classic example of smart bundling
Water PPPs illustrate the power of bundling exceptionally well. A single water project can integrate up to seven components in one contract: water supply, water distribution, reduction of non-revenue water, irrigation systems, sewerage, septage management, and even small hydropower generation.
Instead of separate contracts for each sub-sector, bundling allows operational efficiencies, cross-subsidization, and holistic water resource management.
Revenue from urban water services or hydropower can support less profitable but socially critical components such as irrigation or septage, ensuring universal service without excessive public subsidies.
Land development and integrated infrastructure
Land development PPPs also benefit enormously from bundling. A single development can combine a transport terminal, commercial mall, government offices, internal road networks, water systems, solar power facilities, and fiber-optic infrastructure.
Here, commercial components generate income, while government and public service facilities benefit from shared infrastructure and reduced lifecycle costs. Bundling transforms land assets into economic engines while preserving public control and long-term value.
Hard and soft infrastructure in one vision
Another powerful approach is combining hard infrastructure such as bridges, ports, or flood control structures with soft or development components like socialized housing, agriculture, and education.
The hard infrastructure enables access and resilience; the development components generate revenues and economic activity. Together, they create a self-reinforcing ecosystem rather than a standalone asset.
Cross-subsidy: Making the unviable viable
Perhaps the strongest argument for bundling is cross-subsidization. Revenue-raising components such as power generation, ports, terminals, or commercial developments can subsidize non-revenue or low-revenue but high-impact components—evacuation centers, climate resilience infrastructure, irrigation systems, or flood mitigation works.
Bundling allows governments to deliver socially necessary projects without relying solely on public funds, while still ensuring private sector viability.
One contract, one proponent, one procedure
Finally, bundling simplifies governance. One project means one procurement process, one contract, one proponent or consortium, and one set of performance standards. This reduces transaction costs, minimizes delays, strengthens accountability, and improves monitoring.
In PPPs, bundling is not just about scale. It is about smart integration. When designed well, bundling delivers more services, stronger revenues, deeper impact, and better value for the people, all within a single, coherent partnership.
Contributor
