Historical context
Under Republic Act No. 7718 (amending R.A. 6957, the Build-Operate-Transfer Law), the maximum allowable term for PPP contracts was set at 50 years. Similarly, the 2013 Joint Venture Guidelines issued by the then-NEDA (now Department of Economy, Planning, and Development) also imposed a 50-year limit.
The PPP Code and its IRR
The newly enacted PPP Code (R.A. 11966) and its Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) are different. Neither the law nor its IRR prescribes a maximum contract duration.
Importantly, the IRR Committee cannot impose such a limit. Doing so would violate the principle of subordinate legislation, which holds that administrative rules cannot expand, restrict, or amend what the statute itself does not provide. Under the PPP Code framework, therefore, no statutory cap exists on contract life.
Contractual autonomy with safeguards
Because there is no fixed ceiling, the parties enjoy contractual autonomy in prescribing the term of a PPP agreement. However, this discretion is not absolute.
Any provision contrary to these principles may be struck down as contrary to law or public policy.
Parallels in lease arrangements
The idea of a 99-year term is not unprecedented in Philippine law.
These examples reinforce the legitimacy of 99-year arrangements under certain policy and economic considerations.
Conclusion
Since the PPP Code does not impose a limit, a 99-year PPP or lease contract is legally permissible, provided that it is:
In short, while 99 years may sound extraordinary, it is permissible under Philippine law provided it serves both the people’s welfare and the project’s viability.
Contributor