Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) are often associated with large corporations, big-ticket infrastructure, and complex financing structures. However, under Philippine law, PPPs are not reserved exclusively for large private corporations.
In 2001, the typical Filipino worker captured 48 percent of the value they produced. By 2024, that share had fallen to 31 percent. Over the same period, labor productivity grew 286 percent, while wages rose 147 percent.
On Saturday, Jan. 3, 2026, the United States seized Venezuela's sitting president, flew him to New York, and paraded him in handcuffs into a DEA office. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced charges including narco-terrorism and possession of machine guns in violation of a 1934 American statute.
As 2026 begins, public-private partnerships (PPPs) stand at a critical juncture. In many jurisdictions, including the Philippines, PPPs are no longer evaluated solely by the kilometers of roads built, classrooms delivered, or facilities constructed.
I’ve been hearing in the industry that the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) has been acting promptly on petitions and manifestations, and it has significantly reduced its backlog.
For over 20 years, the Philippines has pursued the development of a competitive electricity market to deliver lower costs to consumers. The Electric Power Industry Reform Act of 2001 (EPIRA) unequivocally mandates that retail competition, consumer choice, and private contracting—not government control—drive efficiency.
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) offer a pathway for better governance in the Department of Education’s (DepEd) infrastructure build-up for classrooms and connectivity.
Reclaimed land has emerged as one of the Philippines’ most strategic platforms for growth, urban expansion, and climate-resilient development, with public-private partnerships (PPPs) playing a central role in unlocking its full potential.